December
24 -- It was the same Swingline stapler, on the same Staples.com website. But
for Kim Wamble, the price was $15.79, while the price on Trude Frizzell's
screen, just a few miles away, was $14.29.
A
key difference: where Staples seemed to think they were located.
A
Wall Street Journal investigation found that the Staples Inc. website displays
different prices to people after estimating their locations. More than that,
Staples appeared to consider the person's distance from a rival
brick-and-mortar store, either OfficeMax Inc. or Office Depot Inc. If rival
stores were within 20 miles or so, Staples.com usually showed a discounted
price.
"How
can they get away with that?" said Ms. Frizzell, who works in Bergheim,
Texas.
In
what appears to be an unintended side effect of Staples' pricing methods—likely
a function of retail competition with its rivals—the Journal's testing also
showed that areas that tended to see the discounted prices had a higher average
income than areas that tended to see higher prices.
Presented
with the Journal's findings, Staples acknowledged that it varies its online and
in-store prices by geography because of "a variety of factors"
including "costs of doing business."
For
years, the Internet, with its promise of quick comparison shopping, has granted
people a certain power over retailers. At the click of a button, shoppers could
find a better deal elsewhere, no travel required.
But
the idea of an unbiased, impersonal Internet is fast giving way to an online
world that, in reality, is increasingly tailored and targeted. Websites are
adopting techniques to glean information about visitors to their sites, in real
time, and then deliver different versions of the Web to different people.
Prices change, products get swapped out, wording is modified, and there is
little way for the typical website user to spot it when it happens.
The
Journal identified several companies, including Staples, Discover Financial
Services, Rosetta Stone Inc. and Home Depot Inc., that were consistently adjusting
prices and displaying different product offers based on a range of
characteristics that could be discovered about the user. Office Depot, for
example, told the Journal that it uses "customers' browsing history and
geolocation" to vary the offers and products it displays to a visitor to
its site.
Offering
different prices to different people is legal, with a few exceptions for
race-based discrimination and other sensitive situations. Several companies
pointed out that their online price-tweaking simply mirrors the real world.
Regular shops routinely adjust their prices to account for local demand,
competition, store location and so on. Nobody is surprised if, say, a gallon of
gas is cheaper at the same chain, one town over.
But
price-changing online isn't popular among shoppers. Some 76% of American adults
have said it would bother them to find out that other people paid a lower price
for the same product, according to the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the
University of Pennsylvania.
"I
think it's very discriminatory," said Ms. Wamble, an insurance account
manager in Boerne, Texas, who priced the Swingline stapler for the Journal this
month. She was just 10 miles or so down the road from Ms. Frizzell, but she saw
higher prices on the Staples website than Ms. Frizzell did for all five
products tested. Items tested included a pack of Bic pens, a case of orange
masking tape, a set of crimped-end mailing tubes and a big safe.
It
remains unclear precisely what formula Staples used to set online prices.
Staples declined to answer detailed questions about the findings. It told the
Journal that "in-store and online prices do vary by geography due to a
variety of factors, including rent, labor, distribution and other costs of
doing business."
It
is possible that Staples' online-pricing formula uses other factors that the
Journal didn't identify. The Journal tested to see whether price was tied to
different characteristics including population, local income, proximity to a
Staples store, race and other demographic factors. Statistically speaking, by
far the strongest correlation involved the distance to a rival's store from the
center of a ZIP Code. That single factor appeared to explain upward of 90% of
the pricing pattern.
What
economists call price discrimination—when companies offer different prices to
different people based on their perceived willingness to pay—is commonplace and
can be beneficial. Movie theaters give senior-citizen discounts. One traveler's
willingness to pay top dollar for an airplane seat might mean other people will
pay less.
In
other cases, though, shoppers can be the loser. That same airline might easily
just pocket the big spender's extra money and leave other prices unchanged.
Of
course, not all price differences are instances of price discrimination. Prices
driven down by competition wouldn't generally be considered discriminatory, for
example.
Basing
online prices on geography can make sense for various reasons, from shipping
costs to local popularity of a particular item. Some retailers might naturally
cluster in specific areas as well—a prosperous suburb, say—boosting the
competitive pressure to discount.
But
using geography as a pricing tool can also reinforce patterns that e-commerce
had promised to erase: prices that are higher in areas with less competition,
including rural or poor areas. It diminishes the Internet's role as an
equalizer.
In
the Journal's examination of Staples' online pricing, the weighted average
income among ZIP Codes that mostly received discount prices was roughly
$59,900, based on Internal Revenue Service data. ZIP Codes that saw generally
high prices had a lower weighted average income, $48,700.
Staples
didn't comment on the income split beyond saying that the company offers a
low-price guarantee.
Online
businesses have experimented with tailored offers since the dawn of the
Internet era. In 1997, a startup called Personify sold software that tried to
personalize Web pages for shoppers. For example, people taking a certain path
through a site could be tagged as price-conscious and be shown low-end items,
said Eileen Gittins, Personify's former chief executive.
"The
idea was more advanced than the technology could support at the time,"
said Ms. Gittins. Today she runs an online company, Blurb, that lets people
make books using their own photos.
In
2000, Amazon.com Inc. infuriated many customers when it sold DVDs to different
people for different prices. Amazon called it merely a test and ultimately
refunded the price difference to people who paid more.
In
2010, the Journal reported that Capital One Financial Corp. was using
personalization technology to decide which credit cards to show first-time
visitors to its website. Recent Journal follow-up testing indicated that
Capital One was showing different users different cards first—either those for
"excellent credit" or "average credit."
Capital
One says it gathers data about visitors while they are on its website and uses
this information to suggest different products to them. "We do not use any
of this data in credit decisioning or underwriting," a Capital One
spokeswoman said. "We're making an educated guess about what we think consumers
will like."
This
year, researchers in Spain studied more than 200 online retailers and found a
handful of examples of price differences—including at Staples within
Massachusetts—that appeared to be based on location and other factors. Those
findings suggest that Staples' price adjustments have been present at least
since this summer.
It
is difficult for online shoppers to know why, or even if, they are being
offered different deals from other people. Many sites switch prices at
lightning speed in response to competitors' offerings and other factors, a
practice known as "dynamic pricing." Other sites test different
prices but do so without regard to the buyer's characteristics.
To
find differences that weren't purely the result of dynamic pricing or
randomized tests, the Journal conducted preliminary scans by simulating visits
from different computers to a variety of e-commerce sites. If a website showed
different prices or offers, the Journal then analyzed the site's computer code
and conducted follow-up testing.
The
Journal's tests, which were conducted in phases between August and December,
indicated that some big-name retailers are experimenting with offering
different prices and products to different users.
Some
sites, for example, gave discounts based on whether or not a person was using a
mobile device. A person searching for hotels from the Web browser of an iPhone
or Android phone on travel sites Orbitz and CheapTickets would see discounts of
as much as 50% off the list price, Orbitz said.
Both
sites are run by Orbitz Worldwide Inc., which in fact markets the differences
as "mobile steals." Orbitz says the deals are also available on the
iPad if a person installs the Orbitz app.
"Many
hotels have proven willing to provide discounts for mobile sites," said Chris
Chiames, Orbitz's vice president of corporate affairs. Hotels on Orbitz mobile
sites also offer discounts "that might target shoppers in a specific
geographic region," as determined by the physical location of the user, as
well as "other factors."
Often,
sites tailored results by geography. In the tests, Discover, for instance,
showed a prominent offer for the company's new "it" card to computers
connecting from cities including Denver, Kansas City, Mo., and Dallas, Texas.
Computers connecting from Scranton, Penn., Kingsport, Tenn., and Los Angeles
didn't see the same offer.
A
Discover spokeswoman said that the company was testing the card, but that for
competitive reasons, it wouldn't comment further on its "acquisition
strategy" for new customers.
At
home-improvement site Lowe's Cos., prices depend on location. For example, a
refrigerator in the Journal's tests cost $449 in Chicago, Los Angeles and
Ashburn, Va., but $499 in seven other test cities. Lowe's said online shoppers
receive the lower of the online store price or the price at their local Lowe's
store as indicated by their ZIP Code.
Home
Depot's website offered price variations that appeared to be based on the
nearest brick-and-mortar store as well. A 250-foot spool of electrical wiring
fell into six pricing groups, including $70.80 in Ashtabula, Ohio; $72.45 in
Erie, Pa.; $75.98 in Olean, N.Y and $77.87 in Monticello, N.Y.
The
company said it uses "IP address," a number assigned to devices that
connect to the Internet, to try to match users to the closest store and align
online prices accordingly.
Location
also seemed to be important for some international companies. The Journal saw
Rosetta Stone, which sells software for learning languages, offering discounts
of as much as 20% for people who bought multiple levels of its German lessons
from certain locations in the U.S. or Canada, but not others from the U.K. or
Argentina.
Rosetta
Stone said it sometimes tests and offers different product "bundles"
in different places. It also personalizes its suggestions based on how the
visitor gets to the site, Rosetta Stone said—whether from a search engine, a
social-media link, a mobile device or a PC. "We are increasingly focused
on segmentation and targeting," a spokesman said. "Every customer is
different."
The
differences found on the Staples website presented a complex pricing scheme.
The Journal simulated visits to Staples.com from all of the more than 42,000
U.S. ZIP Codes, testing the price of a Swingline stapler 20 times in each. In
addition, the Journal tested more than 1,000 different products in 10 selected
ZIP Codes, 10 times in each location.
The
Journal saw as many as three different prices for individual items. How
frequently a simulated visitor saw low and high prices appeared to be tied to
the person's ZIP Code. Testing suggested that Staples tries to deduce people's
ZIP Codes by looking at their computer's IP address. This can be accurate, but
isn't foolproof.
In
the Journal's tests, ZIP Codes whose center was farther than 20 miles from a
Staples competitor saw higher prices 67% of the time. By contrast, ZIP Codes
within 20 miles of a rival saw the high price least often, only 12% of the
time.
Staples.com
showed higher prices most often—86% of the time—when the ZIP Code actually had
a brick-and-mortar Staples store in it, but was also far from a competitor's
store. In calculating these percentages, the Journal excluded New York City and
used the more than 29,000 "standard" ZIP Codes in the 50 states and
District of Columbia. This meant things like ZIP Codes with only post-office
boxes weren't counted.
Prices
varied for about a third of the more than 1,000 randomly selected Staples.com
products tested. The discounted and higher prices differed by about 8% on
average.
There
were a few areas of the U.S. and its territories that offer exceptions. The
Journal found that Puerto Rico was generally shown the higher prices no matter
how close the ZIP Code was to local OfficeMax or Office Depot outlets. For
Guam, on the other hand, tests of Staples.com almost always returned the lower
prices, even though the nearest U.S. OfficeMax or Office Depot is listed online
as being in Hawaii, nearly 4,000 miles away.
New
York City, too, appeared to be a special case. Tests of Staples.com using ZIP
Codes in the boroughs of the Bronx, Manhattan and Staten Island consistently
saw higher prices, while Brooklyn and Queens saw almost only the discounted
prices. This despite the fact that all parts of New York City look to be within
20 miles of a Staples competitor, according to the websites.
As
a final test, the Journal ordered two separate Swingline staplers from
Staples.com, from two nearby ZIP Codes—one costing $14.29 and the other one
$15.79. The staplers arrived the same day. They appear to be indistinguishable
from one another and do an equally thorough job of stapling.
www.professional.wsj.com
No comments:
Post a Comment